Trainspotting
By Roger Ebert
Those who have ventured into the darker corners of addiction
know that one of its few consolations, once the fun has worn
off, is the camaraderie with fellow practitioners. Substance
abuse sets the user apart from the daily lives of ordinary
people. No matter how well the addict may seem to be functioning,
there is always the secret agenda, the knowledge that the
drug of choice is more important than the mundane business
at hand, such as friends, family, jobs, play and sex.
Because no one can really understand that urgency as well
as another addict, there is a shared humor, desperation and
understanding among users. There is even a relief: Lies and
evasions are unnecessary among friends who share the same
needs. ``Trainspotting'' knows that truth in its very bones.
The movie has been attacked as pro-drug and defended as anti-drug,
but actually it is simply pragmatic. It knows that addiction
leads to an unmanageable, exhausting, intensely uncomfortable
daily routine, and it knows that only two things make it bearable:
a supply of the drug of choice, and the understanding of fellow
addicts.
Former alcoholics and drug abusers often report that they
don't miss the substances nearly as much as the conditions
under which they were used--the camaraderie of the true drinkers'
bar, for example, where the standing joke is that the straight
world just doesn't get it, doesn't understand that the disease
is life and the treatment is another drink. The reason there
is a fierce joy in ``Trainspotting,'' despite the appalling
things that happen in it, is that it's basically about friends
in need.
The movie, based on a popular novel by Irvine Welsh, is about
a crowd of heroin addicts who run together in Edinburgh. The
story is narrated by Renton (Ewan McGregor), who will, and
does, dive into ``the filthiest toilet in Scotland'' in search
of mislaid drugs. He introduces us to his friends, including
Spud (Ewen Bremner), who confronts a job interview panel with
a selection of their worst nightmares; Sick Boy (Jonny Lee
Miller), whose theories about Sean Connery do not seem to
flow from ever having seen his movies sober; Tommy (Kevin
McKidd), who returns to drugs one time too many, and Begbie
(Robert Carlyle), who brags about not using drugs but is a
psychotic who throws beer mugs at bar patrons. What a lad,
that Begbie.
These friends sleep where they can--in bars, in squats, in
the beds of girls they meet at dance clubs. They have assorted
girlfriends, and there is even a baby in the movie, but they
are not settled in any way, and no place is home. Near the
beginning of the film, Renton decides to clean up, and nails
himself into a room with soup, ice cream, milk of magnesia,
Valium, water, a TV set, and buckets for urine, feces, and
vomit. Soon the nails have been ripped from the door jambs,
but eventually Renton does detox (``I don't feel the sickness
yet but it's in the mail, that's for sure''), and he even
goes straight for a while, taking a job in London as a rental
agent.
But his friends find him, a promising drug deal comes along,
and in one of the most disturbing images in the movie, Renton
throws away his hard-earned sobriety by testing the drug,
and declaring it... wonderful. No doubt about it, drugs do
make him feel good. It's just that they make him feel bad
all the rest of the time. ``What do drugs make you feel like?''
George Carlin asked. ``They make you feel like more drugs.''
The characters in ``Trainspotting'' are violent (they attack
a tourist on the street) and carelessly amoral (no one, no
matter how desperate, should regard a baby the way they seem
to). The legends they rehearse about each other are all based
on screwing up, causing pain, and taking outrageous steps
to find or avoid drugs. One day they try to take a walk in
the countryside, but such an ordinary action is far beyond
their ability to perform.
Strange, the cult following ``Trainspotting'' has generated
in the UK, as a book, a play and a movie. It uses a colorful
vocabulary, it contains a lot of energy, it elevates its miserable
heroes to the status of icons (in their own eyes, that is),
and it does evoke the Edinburgh drug landscape with a conviction
that seems born of close observation. But what else does it
do? Does it lead anywhere? Say anything? Not really. That's
the whole point. Drug use is not linear but circular. You
never get anywhere unless you keep returning to the starting
point. But you make fierce friends along the way. Too bad
if they die.
View this article here
|