Why bother turning hit film 'Festen' into a play? Because,
says Daniel Rosenthal, the Dogme movement was always more
about the theatre than the cinema...
When the Danish directors Thomas Vinterberg and Lars von Trier
launched their Dogme 95 film-making manifesto, they were reacting
against the emotionally manipulative and formulaic Hollywood
narratives that they saw assuming ever greater control of
the world's cinemas. In taking the Dogme "vow of chastity"
that bans genre movies, "superficial action (murders,
weapons etc)" and all but the most basic techniques (no
sets or artificial lighting, no post-produced sound or music,
hand-held cameras only), the pair forced themselves to focus
all their and their audiences' attention on dialogue and character
- two ingredients that have always been at the heart of good
theatre.
In the first Dogme feature, Vinterberg's Festen (The Celebration,
1998), the combination of these technical restrictions, raw
ensemble performances, a country house setting and a Hamlet-influenced
story of a son exposing the rotten state of a Danish family,
took cinema very close to its theatrical roots. So this week's
new stage adaptation of Festen seems as natural a development
as von Trier's progression from Dogme work on The Idiots (1999)
to the dazzling fusion of film and theatre in his latest feature,
Dogville, in which the eponymous American township resembles
the rehearsal room for a large stage production, its shops
and homes identified only by chalk lines on the studio floor,
leaving the invisible walls and surrounding mountains to be
filled in by what Shakespeare called the audience's "imaginary
forces".
Von Trier has acknowledged his debt to Brecht, Thornton Wilder's
Our Town and the RSC's Nicholas Nickleby, and with Dogville
still in cinemas, Festen popular on DVD and David Eldridge's
adaptation about to open at the Almeida, the Dogme/theatre
synergy is approaching a creative peak.
"What we did on Festen was very closely related to theatre,
I guess the closest that you can get within the framework
of cinema," says Vinterberg, co-author with Mogens Rukov
of the award-winning screenplay in which the lavish 60th birthday
party of a respected hotelier, Helge Klingenfeldt, is disrupted
by his eldest son, Christian, who makes devastating revelations
of childhood abuse.
Vinterberg's view was recently echoed by Trine Dyrholm, who
played Pia, the maid in love with Christian, when she told
Danish magazine Film that the Festen shoot was "somewhat
like working in a dynamic, tightly knit theatre troupe."
But why, exactly? Well, cast and crew had time to build up
an intimate rapport while based at a single location, the
rural hotel; by the end of their run, the Almeida's Festen
company (with Rufus Norris directing a cast headed by Jonny
Lee Miller) will have been based for three months at its north
London rehearsal rooms and auditorium.
During the shoot, cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle's hand-held
digital video camera gave him such mobility that the actors
sometimes couldn't see where he was, explains Vinterberg,
"so they had to act in all directions at all times, in
case they were on camera" - just like stage actors who
are constantly in view of the audience.
The bruising authenticity of the performances in his debut
feature arose, Vinterberg believes, "because Dogme creates
room for actors to perform in a way that is more theatrical
and more liberating than is normal on film sets. They do not
have to hit their marks on the floor, and all the lamps and
dollies and other equipment is taken away. The Dogme rule
that you can't add sound after filming meant that during the
birthday dinner all the [off-camera] sound of knives and forks
had to be done on every take. Everyone had to act in every
shot, not just the one actor in close-up, pretending there
are a lot of people around him [as would happen on a non-Dogme
film]." In one crucial respect, of course, Festen was
anything but theatrical, because Vinterberg, like von Trier
in Dogville, was still armed with the most potent of all film-making
tools: control of point of view. "The major, major difference
is that in the editing room I took the power completely away
from the actors," he says, "and even though it looks
like a wild monster, Festen is a very, very controlled film."
When they saw it, some of Vinterberg's cast couldn't recognise
their performances, because he had removed or reshaped so
much of their work - an occupational hazard they might face
in other screen roles, but never in the theatre.
Vinterberg, whose second feature, It's All About Love, abandoned
the Dogme rules, claims that "even during filming I thought
it would be obvious to make Festen into a play," and
in 1999, not long after it reached British cinemas, Canadian
producer Marla Rubin had the same idea and secured the stage
rights. Vinterberg, Rukov and another writer called Bo hr.
Hansen wrote a stage version for her which follows the film
script very closely. There have been Danish, German, French,
Italian, Swedish and Polish productions of this script already.
The Polish Festen came to London's Sadler's Wells in 2002
and was a hit-and-miss affair - mainly because its director,
Grzegorz Jarzyna, failed to solve many of the basic staging
problems created by the film's fluent cross-cutting between
at least a dozen points in and around the hotel. Several crucial
scenes in the hotel kitchen were played so far upstage that
one would have needed opera glasses to appreciate the acting.
But David Eldridge's adaptation, which Rubin commissioned
from him in 2001, is a less filmic affair.
Giving Festen a more theatrical rhythm and intimacy were
two of the principal challenges faced by Eldridge, who since
making his debut with the council estate drama Serving It
Up in 1996 has written several plays which, like Festen, are
driven by what he calls "huge, life-changing emotional
transactions."
He chose to assume that nobody in the theatre would have
seen the film, and set out "to find a shape for the story
that related most intimately to the shape of the film in its
rawest form. The film's intimacy comes through the use of
the hand-held camera and at the Almeida it comes partially
through the fact that the audience sits really close to the
action and partially because I've placed less than a dozen
people around the dinner table, not the 80-odd guests from
the film." Eldridge has blurred or erased the film's
spatial boundaries, deftly conflated some of its speaking
roles, downplayed others and omitted completely some memorable
characters (notably Michelle, the maid who's had an affair
with Christian's volatile brother, Michael). Lee Miller, who
plays Christian and who watched Vinterberg's "brilliant"
film for the first time two weeks into rehearsals, says the
reduced cast size gives the story a completely new dynamic.
"If you're at a function with a lot of people and someone
drops a bombshell, as Christian does, it's a lot easier to
paper over the cracks, for everything to continue as normal,"
he says. "But if there's only about 12 of you, there's
nowhere to hide."
Director Rufus Norris says he has found himself in "a
dangerous position": obliged to set aside his boundless
admiration for the film (his all-time favourite) "to
ensure that we celebrate the theatricality of David's script
in a way that takes the story away from Dogme and is not just
a homage to the film. Several theatre friends have asked me
'Why bother staging Festen when it's been done on film?' I
can see why they'd say that, and a lot of people will judge
us against the film, but we are doing something bold and different,
trying to create a visual language that's organic to this
piece of theatre.
"Vinterberg had terrific freedom to film from room to
room and even more freedom in the editing suite. But he didn't
have the freedom of rehearsing for weeks and making use of
the choices that actors make in that environment." This
opportunity to give theatrical voice to a screen narrative
explains why for every friend who's asked "Why bother
staging Festen?", another has called Norris a lucky bastard.
If his production succeeds, this could be the beginning of
a beautiful new friendship between Dogme and theatre. Vinterberg
agrees with my suggestion that several of the other nine Danish
films made under the vow of chastity could safely navigate
the journey from screen to stage, and Rubin is already in
discussions about future Dogme stage projects. For my money,
Søren Kragh-Jacobsen's Mifune (1999) - centred around
a newly-wed Copenhagen man, his mentally handicapped older
brother and the prostitute who takes refuge in their rundown
farmhouse - was second-division Dogme, but would probably
require minimal tweaking to make an engaging five-hander,
playable on a single set. Given the long tradition of successful
stage dramas set behind bars, there could also be a theatrical
future for the newest Danish Dogme entry, Annette K Olesen's
witty and intensely moving In Your Hands, whose tale of the
chaplain and inmates at a women's prison has echoes of a play
premiered at Edinburgh's Traverse Theatre two years ago, Rona
Munro's Iron.
Having borrowed liberally from theatre, Dogme could be repaying
its debt, with interest, for years to come.
Too see this article please click here
|